NEXT SUB-SECTION: Case Studies of Notably Successful Projects with high value Precision Configuration >>>
One of the key areas of ERP and IBIS configuration which James Robertson has pioneered and provided thought leadership in relates to the effective use of the standard Attribute lists within the software AND the addition of custom attribute lists identified by the client
In configuring an ERP it is vital that every Master File is comprehensively configured with every possible attribute that executives, managers and operators apply in thinking about that item
If these are ALL captured in simple custom lists populated with highly effective strategically structured content the ERP suddenly becomes radically more powerful as a strategic resource -- key to this is effective facilitation
Consider the following "before and after" example with Credit Note Reason Codes
On the left hand side we see the content of the Credit Note Reason Codes list at the time that Dr Robertson became involved
On the right hand side we see the content after strategic facilitation by Dr Robertson together with key senior staff members AND the CEO
On the left there is hardly a question that can be answered without pulling transaction level data into a spreadsheet and paying an expensive mid-level employee to spend hours trying to make sense of the data -- AND why two people will get two different results -- AND why you will have to do all the hard work again next month -- AND why you may need to spend another large sum of money on some fancy piece of software to try and sort out the spaghetti (polite name of MESS) as Dr Robertson calls it
On the right every possible question in the domain of "why did we issue credit notes?" is instantly answerable
Contact us on James@James-A-Robertson-and-Associates.com for information as to how with a modest investment JAR&A can enable you to unlock the full potential of your Master Data
Few people really understand the significance and importance of business defined attribute fields in software design and operation generally and in Integrated Business Information Systems and ERP generally. This document headlines the reasons why your organization should invest in developing a really high quality set of Attribute Fields and populating them with really high quality structured data.
1. Attributes are the way we accurately model the real world
Attributes are the way we model the real world. They can be as simple as a male / female gender classification and as complex as a huge product classification for a mining operation.
2. Strategic Attributes are often less tangible
Strategic Attributes are often less tangible, a client, in the business of marketing and selling Golf Clubs identified the sound that a Driver (a type of club) makes as an important characteristic in buyers fashion driven purchase decisions – buy clubs that sound the same as the club used by the world champion. These items are often tacit and it can require strategically skilled facilitation to identify them and populate the associated lists.
3. User defined Attribute fields cost very little to add at the configuration stage
When user defined attribute fields are added to a logical entity while the system is being configured the time cost of specifying and adding them is small relative to the total cost of the system investment. Many times it also takes only a few minutes of the appropriate (executive) time to populate these lists and yet they add huge value. Adding them later can be a very costly matter because of the time taken for testing, updating of working procedures, manuals, training materials, new instructions to staff, changes to stationery and all the time required to go back and classify historical entries when no-one can really remember the exact characteristics.
4. Strategically designed attributes open the door for strategically clever customization
The presence of strategically designed and precision structured and coded attribute lists and master list classifications opens the door for small pieces of strategically clever custom software to add HUGE and lasting strategic (competitive / thrive) value as well as huge operational value and process efficiency. These pieces of software are frequently ONLY possible with really well designed attribute fields and attribute list content and can raise the strategic (competitive / thrive) value of an IBIS / ERP / Other IT investment by a factor of ten or even a hundred by enabling the client organization to do things that would otherwise be impossible.
5. The allocation of values during operational processing costs almost nothing
Once user defined attribute fields have been added, it costs almost nothing to add the few extra values to take-on sheets or screens by senior people who are fully immersed in the business and are aware of the nuances of products, customers, personnel, etc. These are the same people who are generally customers for this information months or years later. To go back and retro-classify the same data when the attributes are no longer top of mind or at your fingertips is generally a more time consuming process but is nevertheless STILL worth doing.
6. The capture of attribute values at take-on time costs almost nothing
Where punch operators are taking on data or data is being supplied by suppliers who can be persuaded to include the attributes in their databases the finger on the keyboard time to capture a few extra attribute values is zero or close to zero and so a wealth of additional information is acquired at almost no operational cost. Even where some digging IS required, creative measures can greatly reduce the acquisition cost.
7. The absence of Strategic Attributes is the biggest single factor in big sub-optimal system investment performance
The absence of strategically aligned and focussed attribute data, as well as operationally relevant attribute data – “every possible attribute you can think of” is the biggest single reason why executives cannot get answers to their questions from their ERP and other Integrated Business Information System (IBIS) investments. The cost of adding these items later is much greater but IS still warranted in terms of the savings that follow such an enhancement of a piece of software and its configuration.
8. The JAR&A approach to strategic attribute definition and population is unique
I have been developing and using such attribute tables since 1987 and have seen some dramatic improvements in strategic AND operational efficiency and effectiveness as a result. I regard these fields as absolutely essential for any business systems investment and have very diverse experience with regard to the identification and population of these fields.
I hope that this provides some information to stimulate your interest in custom attribute fields and look forward to the opportunity to develop such fields for your organization
The CRM Risk Control Case Study is a classic example of how massive benefits were achieved through a simple piece of software that made maximum use of taxonomies resulting in reduction of budgeted clerks from 12 to 4, massive increases in management information and capture of 90% of available data, far greater than expected Integrated Risk Management System.pdf
This sort of dramatic benefit is NOT always achieved but it is an indication of what can be achieved using the techniques that we advocate
Contact us for more information -- James@James-A-Robertson-and-Associates.com
This article introduces critical principles that every executive and
manager should know in order to be able to derive full value from their
business information systems investments. These principles apply
to your ERP and other financial systems, your business intelligence
systems and your general operational software systems.
These principles, correctly applied, will enable most organizations to
substantially improve the strategic and operational decision support
information yield of their business information systems facilitating
better decision making and more effective and more profitable enterprise
They are equally applicable to nonprofit and governmental organizations.
This article discusses actions you can take immediately and other
actions that will require careful planning and whose implementation will
take some time. It headlines a number of typical problem areas
and steps to correct them. Further articles are planned that will
define the fundamental principles that underpin the application of these
recommendations and provide recommendations with regard to
Factors which will indicate whether it is worthwhile to read this article include:
Ten steps you can take to strategically enrich your business information systems
These notes apply to differing degrees to every module of every
business information system from every software vendor on the
planet. They do not relate to technology, they relate to how
information is organized to make maximum sense to human beings and in
order to facilitate maximum ease of electronic processing.
They relate to principles that are well understood in certain quarters
but hardly understood, or if understood, imprecisely applied in the
majority of business information system installations. These
factors are the most significant factors behind Gartner's finding that
"most organizations are not making better decisions now than they did
five years ago".
These suggestions apply whether we are speaking of financial
transactions or product records, whether we are dealing with the General
Ledger Chart of Accounts, the Product Class, the Item Master, the
Materials Group, Personnel Class or any other database table large or
small in any system.
I will primarily use examples from the Chart of Accounts as this is
more universally applicable than any other information list and any
other Master Data.
Many technologists will look at what is presented here and tell you
"but FRED (the name of your system), is so powerful it can handle
this!" Do not listen to them, this is not about technology it is
about organizing information in meaningful ways that accurately model
the real world so that the full potential of the technology can be
unlocked and the data is easily and quickly interpreted by managers and
If you follow the steps set out below and systematically and
progressively apply them to your systems you will find in a few years'
time that you are getting much more information faster and easier and
that your business is running smoother and better. You may even
find that some of your mid-level administrative personnel are much more
gainfully employed or that somehow the headcount has reduced without you
really planning it.
The principal requirements of executives
In considering what follows I suggest that the principal requirements
of executives for any business information system include:
What is presented here is designed to assist you to reach the above goals.
All that follows relates to the classification lists, attribute lists,
Chart of Accounts and other classification and grouping lists that exist
in all software to varying degrees. These are the classifications
that are used to order, group and analyze data. If they are well
structured, well designed and well maintained the software is a pleasure
to use, if not ...!
I stress that this information is relevant at the executive and senior
manager level -- once you understand the real issues then you can manage
the problems referred to above out of your systems.
1. Ambiguous item names
Account or item names are ambiguous resulting in different personnel
posting differently e.g. "Smelting and refining" -- Asset or
Expense? Clean up the lists and make names unambiguous "Smelting
and refining operating expenses".
2. "Clumping" of transactions
A single item or account covers substantial numbers of diverse
transactions monthly e.g. the "Smelting and refining operating expenses"
example above is a £100 million asset with hundreds if not thousands of
expense transactions monthly. Break this down into five to ten
major categories and, in this particular case, break each of those down
into between five and ten categories. Assemble this into a very
carefully designed hierarchical list (taxonomy), code it using
structured codes and immediately you will be able to analyze your
expenses much more exactly.
The level of detail should model the real world at the finest level of
detail that you will ever ask questions on. The computer can only
drill down automatically to the finest level of detail that you capture
and maintain and it can only group automatically to the extent that
there is logic in your code scheme. Well-designed lists and codes =
easy to post accurately, easy to analyze, electronic drill down and
summarization. The opposite = lots of manual work in Excel or
complex reports or both.
the following real world example:
Typical Credit Note Reason Codes
They look reasonable ... don't they?
Versus Strategically and Systematically Designed Reason Codes
With the first list you will struggle to answer most management
questions, with the second you will answer almost any conceivable
management question -- same software, same business, different classification data.
3. Cannot get answers to simple questions easily
The example above gives you the answer. Survey your staff, find
out where they are struggling to get answers, examine the classification
lists, make changes in line with the example above. I intend to
give more guidance on how to do this in subsequent articles.
4. The information you need is not there
You are asking questions that are important, for example with regard to
market trends, and you cannot get the answers without putting a fairly
senior person onto spending days with Excel and direct research to
arrive at an answer that no-one has confidence in.
Add the relevant characteristics to the master data e.g.
buying patterns for golf clubs are influenced by the sound they make
relative to the sound of the clubs used by the top players on the
circuit. Fashions change and it is desirable to monitor trends. Add
"Golf Club Sound" as an attribute on your Product Master record -- an hour
or two to add the attribute to the database, some days to classify all
the products and immediately you have real time tracking of trends for
ever at almost no extra cost. Just make sure you do the job
properly first time -- the Engineering Approach!
You can quickly and easily add any number of attribute lists to your
master files in this way and with a bit of effort you can classify all
your products and capture the extra data. This applies to
personnel data, to production data, to equipment spares, you name it you
can add attributes and it costs almost nothing to do this relative to
what you have spent in total on your systems thus far. And the
return on investment is very substantial!
Vital to do this to a high standard or rigour and precision in order to experience the full return.
The key question to executives and senior managers should be
"what are ALL the possible attributes that you can possibly think of to
describe a ... (e.g. golf club)" -- brainstorm, classify and, if in doubt, add it
5. Duplicate items
Quite frequently different departments define their own sets of
classification codes to suit their purposes. For example I once
found an Item Master where exactly the same earth moving machine tyre
occurred in three different places.
Evaluate the logic of the list, select a single instance of the item
and close the others down. If you keep getting incomplete reports
or reports from different departments do not agree this is frequently
6. Lots of spreadsheets with manual manipulation
You have a significant number of mid-level and even senior staff with
spreadsheets producing the monthly Board Pack and other management
reports. When you question the numbers the query has to cascade
down through the ranks until the operator at the bottom extracts
required data and the hierarchy of managers and accountants process the
data back up through their spreadsheets. Expensive, frustrating
and a total waste of time.
Look at the data that is giving the problems and develop overarching
logical code schemes from first principles that accurately model the
real world. Introduce these into the Transform layer of a new
instance of your data warehouse and transform the data into logically
structured hierarchical classifications that you can roll up
electronically. A significant project but will give substantial
benefits and probably reduce administrative costs. I plan to
discuss how to do this in more detail in future articles.
7. Different departments have different definitions
I once came across a large multi-national organization
where operations, finance and human resources had three different systems
-- SAP in the finance domain, another instance of SAP in the human resource
domain and a completely different operational system used by those who
actually produced the output of the business. The employee
classification and grouping in the three systems did not agree at all to
the extent that even the most elementary employee category related
analysis was to all intents and purposes impossible. It is vital
to have a single harmonized standard across the enterprise, this
standard needs to be driven from the office of the Chief Executive as
the custodian of the integrated view of the business and must be
extremely well engineered to the highest standards of what I am
advocating here. Once in place huge benefits will result.
8. Cannot correlate measures of customer satisfaction with the hard data
Soft measures like customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, etc
are seldom correlated with actual production and sales data for all of
the reasons given above and others.
Modify your customer satisfaction instrument (questionnaire post card,
etc) so that it is issued in such a way that it has a unique bar code or
other identifying code discreetly printed or in some other way linked
back to the specific transaction associated with the issue of the
questionnaire. Scan the results back into your system and use the
unique code to join the customer satisfaction data with your operational
data. You will immediately be able to monitor performance of a
wide range of matters electronically in ways you previously might only
have dreamed of.
9. Your major lists are badly structured and a nightmare to navigate
Point 6 above will start pointing you in this direction.
Critically examine your Item Class, Product Class, Material Group,
Employee Group, Chart of Accounts and other major lists in the light of
what you read here and what I plan to share with you in the months
ahead. My experience tells me that you will almost certainly
discover that they are extremely badly organized with little or no
logic, innumerable haphazard groupings, if there are any groupings at
If you dig further you may well find that it takes ages for new staff
to learn how to post accurately, that new staff may even give up and
leave, that posting errors are prevalent, that supervisors and even
managers expend significant time working around the badly ordered data,
that no one actually trusts the data and that the people who get the job
done rely on their own pieces of software and spreadsheets outside of
your core systems.
The extract from a Chart of Accounts shown here is an example of an
extremely badly designed Chart of Accounts, so much so that the client
was running their business almost entirely with Excel.
Interestingly the software vendor told me that his software, call it
FRED, "is so powerful it can handle this data". The client failed
to take my advice and is now in Business Rescue.
The answer is not to buy new software, it is to build
new classification lists -- by doing this you will dramatically raise the
quality of management information and realize the true value of your
systems. This is a classic example of the underlying
fundamental behind "most organizations are not making better decisions
now than they did five years ago."
Allocation of overheads to production business units is approximate and
highly manual and financial reporting generally is cumbersome
Finally you may find that the allocation of overheads is a source of
contention and uncertainty. You may find that your managers are
managing off Excel spreadsheets with little or no regard to the
financial system. In extreme cases you may find that from an
operational point of view only the Accounts Department and the Auditors
really make use of the Financial Suite. You may also find that the
audit costs much more than you would like it to and takes much longer
than you think it should. Look no further than a badly designed
Chart of Accounts that does not accurately model the real world with
numerous management journals that have no place in the core financial
A Chart of Accounts should accurately model the business in a
sophisticated compound code scheme that incorporates every element of
the business in distinct code segments comprising Divisions, Locations,
Functions and Accounts. These are fundamental logical entities
with information management rules as hard as concrete that must be
rigorously and precisely defined in highly structured hierarchies and
coded to engineering standards of precision. I use custom
developed software to ensure the consistency of the code scheme when I
build such Charts of Accounts. Be aware that people will tell you
that their Chart of Accounts complies with what I have just said.
In my experience they almost never approximate the level of engineering
rigour that I regard as non-negotiable.
This model then forms the basis of how the entire business is
represented to the diverse computer systems that form the administrative
backbone of every organization. Application of this approach can
take place in the Transformation layer into the Data Warehouse and, in
time, the operational Financial Suite can be reimplemented.
I aim to follow this article with further articles discussing in detail
the principles to be applied in this field of Strategic Information
I also aim to provide guidance on the approach to be used in implementing these recommendations.
If you recognize that there is NOTHING more important than the
configuration data that we have been talking about and that, correctly
addressed, remediation of all the above items can make a huge
difference. And your recognize that this should be undertaken to
high standards of precision, as you would in any engineering endeavor,
you will open the door to add very substantial value to your
organization and unlock huge value from your existing business
A hundred fold increase in information value is entirely achievable
and, coupled to this, greatly improved management efficiency and
business competitiveness leading to increase profitability and growth.
I offer advisory services with regard to the application of these
principles and would be delighted to discuss how I might be of
assistance. I also offer a light touch diagnostic service to
evaluate the state of your information tables and advise how to
Dr James Robertson PrEng
A rigorous (engineering approach) to strategic planning using critical issues based analysis techniques and structured gap analysis techniques to develop a comprehensive and rigorous multi-year plan that is measurable and actionable and traceable back to the original analysis in order to produced high value outcomes, requires effective strategic facilitation
Business Systems NOT delivering?
Call the Business Systems Specialist
Dr James A Robertson -- has been involved in the effective application of Business Information Systems, including but NOT limited to ERP, since 1987 and in the profitable and effective use of computers in Business since 1981.
Drawing on a diversity of experience, including formal military training in Quick Attack techniques at the Regimental Commander level, Dr Robertson has developed highly effective methods of investigating any sub-optimal Business Information Systems situation -- be it an established system or a stalled project or any other source of Executive frustration -- quickly and concisely diagnosing the root cause of the problem and prescribing concise practical actions that Business Executives can effectively act on see the Pulse Measurement page and also the Sample Reports page for redacted real reports.
He has also developed highly effective methods of strategically enriching systems to unlock the full potential of existing investments, see the Precision Configuration page and couples this to architecting small pieces of clever software that harness the full potential of your investment, see the Software page.
If you are having problems with your systems, your project or your IT Department, call The Business Systems Specialist
Business System Failure is RIFE -- we offer insight into why this happens AND WHAT is required to prevent it.
Failure is at epidemic levels with massive damage done to client companies -- if you are NOT aware of the extent of the problem please visit the About Failure page for a catalog of major failures running to billions of Pounds and Dollars.
All evidence indicates that the established players do NOT know how to deliver stable, reliable high value solutions that WORK.
There HAS to be a better way!
This website provides information relating to that way with a large collection of white papers, presentations, standards documents, etc that you can use to start bringing the situation under control
We also offer high level advisory services with regard to the application of the principles advocated on this website
We offer an ENGINEERING APPROACH to addressing these issues
By Engineering I mean the formal, structured, highly disciplined, highly systematic, highly practical approach that consistently delivers results in ALL areas of human endeavor where formally trained and certified engineers are the ONLY practitioners permitted to operate -- think large buildings, factories, motor vehicles, aircraft -- highly complex systems that work at a level that we take it for granted that they WILL work and where failure is all but unthinkable and, when it happens, attracts immediate public attention and rigorous investigation directed at ensuring that such failures are prevented in the future -- in fact, everything that the management consulting industry that implements complex software systems is NOT
This approach is discussed further on the Engineering Approach page.
In 2003 I undertook an in-depth analysis of all the information and experience that I had gathered with regard to the factors giving rise to Business Information System failure including ERP and general IT and classified this information into a number of categories including "The Factors Causing Failure" and "The Critical Factors for Success" based on this I developed a two day Course "The Critical Factors for Information Technology Investment Success" which is still offered today.
Based on this I wrote the book of the same name, which is available in electronic form here for download:
James has a very detailed profile on LinkedIn should you require further information about him.
You can also connect with him on LinkedIn at http://www.linkedin.com/in/DrJamesARobertsonERPDoctor
James has an open networking profile -- click on "Connect" and use email address James@LinkedIn-at-JARA.com.
Click here to send us an email subscribing to our free newsletter -- all articles posted by James Robertson will be emailed to you
You can contact us on
LinkedIn at http://www.linkedin.com/in/drjamesarobertsonerpdoctor
Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/james.a.robertson.393
Mobile: +44 (0) 776-862-2875
Landline: +44 (0) 207-059-0007
Fax: +44 (0) 844 774 4580
There is a large body of white papers, articles and other content produced by Dr James Robertson available on this website
Please click here to visit the detailed listing of articles
About Dr James A Robertson PrEng -- The Business Systems Doctor -- and Other Topics
Catalogue of Major Business Information System Failures
About the Engineering Approach
James Robertson's Value Add
Attributes of a HIGH VALUE solution
Recognizing Business System Failure
The Critical Human Foundation
Old Software IS Viable
From South Africa
Competencies of Dr James A Robertson PrEng
About Professor Malcolm McDonald
Table of Contents
About my relationship with the Almighty Creator, Yah the Eternally Self-Existing
Comments relating to the Business Systems Industry and other topics
Testimonials and other positive material regarding James Robertson
List of Articles
Achieving High Value Business Information System outcomes
Executive Custody -- What is it and HOW do you get it?
The REAL Issues in Integrated Business Information System Success
Part 1: Introduction
Part 2 -- Mythology and Lack of Executive Custody
Part 3 – Strategic Alignment and Precision Configuration
Why your ERP is NOT delivering and HOW to FIX it
IT Project Management
CEO Anthony Lee Comments on his experience of the Pulse Measurement
No Charge Guarantee on the Pulse Measurement Service
Examples of Pulse Measurement Outcomes
Critical questions regarding the Pulse Measurement™
The Pulse Measurement Workflow
The Critical Factors for Business System (ERP+) Investment Success in the Pulse Measurement
Indicative Pulse Measurement Durations
What is a JAR&A Pulse Measurement?
Survival of the fittest – why it makes sense to measure the pulse of your business
Examples of Pulse Measurement Outcomes over 24 years
Sample Pulse Measurement Reports
Strategic Essence: The Missing Link in Business Information Systems
Strategic Essence: Overview
Strategic Essence: Part 1 -- Strategy Defined
Strategic Essence: Part 2 -- Differentiation
Strategic Essence: Part 3 -- The Essence IS Different
Strategic Essence: Part 4 -- The Essence should be the Point of Departure
Strategic Essence: Part 5 -- Discovering Strategic Essence
Strategy -- the Essence of the Business: What is it and how do you develop actionable strategic plans?
Simple Steps to Increase the Strategic Value of your ERP Investment
Free Strategic Snapshot Toolset and Manual
A strategy focused planning system beyond traditional budgeting
Tough IT and ERP Procurement and Contracting that Works
Robust Business Systems Procurement
Part 1 -- Introduction
Part 2 -- Bill of Services, Laboratory, Go-live Certificate, etc
Part 3 -- Executive Engagement, Bid Compliance, Adjudication and other matters
Guidance and Advisory Services
The Art of Project Leadership
Why Regular Communication with the CEO is Vital
The Business Simulation Laboratory
Precision Configuration and Strategic Business Information Architecture
Precision Configuration based on Strategic Engineered Precision Taxonomies
The JAR&A Cubic Business Model
Highly Structured Strategic Chart of Accounts -- a Vital Element of your Corporate Information Arsenal
The Product Catalogue -- an Essential Element of any Precision Configuration
Attributes -- answers to the questions you have NOT yet thought to ask
Case Studies of Notably Successful Projects with high value Precision Configuration
092 Doing things differently and better -- ASCO Case Study 2-- BPM Summit 2013
088 Strategic ERP Invesment -- ASCO Case Study -- Service Management Conference and Exhibition Africa
026 Information Architecture and Design of FIS for Rennies Group -- Financial Information Systems Conf
018 CRM Risk Control: Designing and Implementing an Integrated Risk Mgmt Sys -- Integrated Risk Mgmt Conf
011 V3 Consulting Eng: Benefits of MIS to Professional Practice -- SAICE 15th Ann Conf on Computers in Civil Eng
Strategically Enriching your Business Information Systems
Part 2 -- Principles of Data Engineering
Part 3 -- Steps in applying these recommendations
Simple Steps to increase the strategic information value yield from your Business Systems Investment
The Full JAR&A Taxonomy Manual
Part 1: Introduction, Problem Statement, Definitions and Examples
Part 2: Why Use JAR&A, Required Knowledge and Experience, Cubic Business Model and Chart of Accounts and Taxonomy Software
Part 3: How to do it, Case Studies and White Papers and other References
Example General Ledger Manual
Business Process -- Irrelevant, Distracting and Dangerous
The RIGHT Approach
Custom Strategic Software Design and Oversight of Construction
Standards for Custom Software Specification
What IS Software?
Critical Factors for I.T. Success
A Moral and Ethical Dilemma -- Systems that Fail
Case Studies examining Business Information System failures
The BBC Digital Media Initiative Debacle
The Bridgestone -- IBM Conflict
Speaking and Training
Showcase of Conference Presentations
Most Viewed Presentations
Briefings and Seminars
Why your ERP/BIS is NOT delivering and HOW to FIX it
ERP and IT Procurement that Delivers Results
The Critical Factors for IT and ERP Investment Success
Conferences and Public Presentations
Conferences 80 to 99 -- 2009 to Present
Conferences 60 to 79 -- 2005 to 2009
Conferences 40 to 59 -- 1996 to 2005
Conferences 20 to 39 -- 1994 to 1996
Conferences 01 to 19 -- 1989 to 1994
On-Line Seminars (Webinars)
Webinar on Preparing and Presenting Webinars
Contacting James A Robertson and Associates Limited